5/3/1 vs simple linear progression for an early intermediate - which would you pick?

Discuss full-body, split routines, powerlifting, etc.
Image
IronWarrior
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2025 10:18 am

5/3/1 vs simple linear progression for an early intermediate - which would you pick?

Post by IronWarrior »

Newbie linear gains are slowing - still adding weight most weeks but it's getting hard. Should I switch to 5/3/1 now or ride linear progression until it fully stalls? Don't want to leave gains on the table by switching too early.
StrengthGeek
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2025 10:20 am

Re: 5/3/1 vs simple linear progression for an early intermediate - which would you pick?

Post by StrengthGeek »

Ride linear progression until it genuinely stops, not when it just gets hard. Adding weight every week is the fastest progression there is - don't abandon it while it's still working just because it requires effort.
IronWarrior
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2025 10:18 am

Re: 5/3/1 vs simple linear progression for an early intermediate - which would you pick?

Post by IronWarrior »

Fair, it IS still working, just not as easy as month one.
StrengthGeek
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2025 10:20 am

Re: 5/3/1 vs simple linear progression for an early intermediate - which would you pick?

Post by StrengthGeek »

That's normal and good. Squeeze every last week out of it. Switch to a percentage-based program like 5/3/1 only when you genuinely stall for 2-3 weeks despite good recovery.
SquatSensei
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2025 4:00 am

Re: 5/3/1 vs simple linear progression for an early intermediate - which would you pick?

Post by SquatSensei »

When you do switch, 5/3/1 is great for early intermediates because:
  • It forces you to start lighter and build (saves you from stalling instantly)
  • Slow, sustainable monthly progression
  • Built-in deloads so you don't burn out
  • Simple to run and hard to mess up

But it progresses slower than linear by design - which is exactly why you don't switch until linear is dead.
PowerCoach
Posts: 3
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2025 1:43 am

Re: 5/3/1 vs simple linear progression for an early intermediate - which would you pick?

Post by PowerCoach »

This is the right sequence. Beginners should milk linear gains fully, then move to a structured intermediate program. Switching early just trades fast progress for slow progress prematurely.
DeadliftKing
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2025 4:04 am

Re: 5/3/1 vs simple linear progression for an early intermediate - which would you pick?

Post by DeadliftKing »

I switched to 5/3/1 too early out of boredom and actually progressed slower for a few months. Wish I'd kept adding weight while I still could. Learn from my impatience.
IronWarrior
Posts: 1
Joined: Tue Mar 25, 2025 10:18 am

Re: 5/3/1 vs simple linear progression for an early intermediate - which would you pick?

Post by IronWarrior »

That's exactly what I was about to do - switch out of boredom.
DeadliftKing
Posts: 6
Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2025 4:04 am

Re: 5/3/1 vs simple linear progression for an early intermediate - which would you pick?

Post by DeadliftKing »

Boredom is not a stall. Add some accessory variety to stay engaged but keep the linear progression on the main lifts until it truly dies.
GainsGuru
Posts: 4
Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2025 3:57 am

Re: 5/3/1 vs simple linear progression for an early intermediate - which would you pick?

Post by GainsGuru »

Also consider a small step: when weekly jumps stall, try adding weight every 2 weeks instead, or micro-loading with small plates. That can extend linear gains for months before you need a whole new system.
Post Reply